ALL EYES ARE SET AT THE APEX COURT.
K enyans are glued to their television sets and others on their smart phones and desktop computers following the Supreme Court proceedings. If you move from one ridge to the other , one village to the other , one market to the other , one shopping centre to the other , in the makeshift vibandas and kiosks , the conversation has drastically changed from Azimio la Umoja and Kenya Kwanza Alliance to the heavy legal terms and complex lingual jargons being traded at the apex courts. The social media too is awash with misinformation, disinformation and Propaganda as both camps , Azimio la Umoja and Kenya Kwanza Alliance are pulling strings to themselves. That's why , innuendos and half baked truths are the fodder of the day in this Zuckerberg streets. They say a battle isn't won in the battle field but in the boardroom. And if you lose it , it is not accidental , it is a manifestation that, you have been winning. Losing and winning is a process just like an election is a process and not an event.
The Supreme Court is expected to give guidance and the way forward. We cannot anticipate this Country to go the Somalia way , or thr Sudan way or the DRC route. That's why, the peace and tranquility we are enjoying as a Country as we speak , shows , Kenyans and politicial elites have trust and confidence in our Supreme Court. Both parties , the petitioners and respondents must commit to maintain peace irregardless of the kind of ruling the court will make. If it favours Kenya Kwanza Alliance, that is , it uphelds president elect William Ruto victory , the petitioner must accept and move on. If the Court rules of a recount and it is found that the petitioner's victory was robbed through electoral malpractices geared towards ensuring Ruto wins , and it is found Raila Odinga won , this will followed by revocation of Ruto's victory and his Certificate and gazette notice published by the IEBC chair declaring Ruto as president elect quashed , then Ruto should accept. Of the Supreme Court nullifies the whole presidential election and orders a fresh one and what would have informed that decision is because of many illegalities and irregularities and total breach of electoral rules and regulations , how if the Supreme Court can order for a repeat presidential election , which commission can hold it now that IEBC can no longer be in existence?
The question occupying hectares of space in kenyans mind is that because, we expect the only commission that can be tasked to conduct that election is IEBC. Similarly , the SCoK can bar chairman Wafula Chebukati to conduct the repeat election. That means , the vice chairperson Juliana Cherera can step in and hold the chairperson seat on an interim basis and the commission can have the quorum to conduct that repeat presidential election. Much is expected from the apex court. The 7 judges are the citizens of this Country and they reside in it since , as judicial officers , they work from Monday to Friday. In 2017 , the SCoK nullified the presidential election amid protests from Jubilee Party supporters who went gaga and took to the social media to profile judges who nullified President Uhuru Kenyatta victory. Only two Judges dissented with the decision to nullify that victory. The infuriated President Uhuru Kenyatta whose victory was quashed rebuked those judges and even vowed to revisit that issue. Though he participated in the repeat presidential election , his main rival chickened out citing lack of trust in the electoral Commission and especially the chairman Wafula Chebukati.
Comments
Post a Comment